Return to Index
 Register   FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 
 
Search:
 
The time now is Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:00 am
View unanswered posts
 Navigation Menu 
 Home
Back to home  Home
phpBB Forum Index  Forum
  Calendar
  Gallery
  Sudoku
  What's New
  Rover's Profiles
Site Statistics Page  SiteStats
  RSS Feed
  IRC Chat (DEV)

 Recent Messages 
No new posts The 12 Pubs of Christmas 2010
Chat
Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:02 pm View latest post
No new posts Massive Overhaul
Website Feedback
Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:32 am View latest post
No new posts hooray!
Chat
Thu Aug 26, 2010 1:39 pm View latest post

 Login 
Username:

Password:

 Log me on automatically each visit

Inside the ROF pictures
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bishy Boys Forum Index :: Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
big gus
Cub
Cub

Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 36
Location: Bish

PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
yeah i thought of that but it could have been a smoke screen but there was a lot of places we didn't go to like right up the back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
GraemeB
Leader
Leader

Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 136
Location: Bishopton

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
big gus wrote:
yeah i thought of that but it could have been a smoke screen but there was a lot of places we didn't go to like right up the back.


Very few people will know, if anyone, exactly what is inside the factory and where.
It's just one of these things and if the houses are to go ahead we will have to trust the judgement of the so called experts in land testing.
They're testing the land and water as it is just now, if they do happen to find some potentialy dangerous chemicals what happens if once the ground is disturbed or dug for whatever reason and all of a sudden there is a problem when the earth is moved to another part if the site ?
It's something that simple that could cause major problems.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Fyfey
DC
DC

Joined: 22 Apr 2002
Posts: 210
Location: Bishopton

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
I was talking to someone last night who said the knew some of the people who were taking the core samples. He said som of the staff walked off the site after seeing what they brough up in the samples. They brought up the samples and looked at what was in them then said I'm not moving that and walked off the site.

Just another rumour to add to the pile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dougie80
DC
DC

Joined: 11 Jan 2003
Posts: 221
Location: In a galaxy far far away....

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
[quote="Gi­llian"]
Quote:


This report was in relation to a Radioactiv­e substances act . The report -came from differenti­aion exercise report on the ROF grounds as commisione­d by the counil. Anyway, the request under FoI act was refused on the grounds that "its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice substantia­lly national security" .

Just as a side note, when council representi­ves made the same request for the same informatio­n, they too were refused on the grounds that "its disclosure would or would be likely to prejudice substantia­lly national security".

Makes you think, doesnt it...



I could only assume that the radioactiv­e substances were sources used to X-ray the shells to ensure they were filled correctly, there were a number of X-ray sites across the ROF as a whole.

As for the "national security" bit, I'd assume (probably incorrectl­y) that all and any military operations­ , whether military, ordnance, manufactur­e or operationa­l would come under the official secrets act and would not be disclosed under the Freedom of Informatio­n Act?

I feel for the drillers on site, ground investigat­ion always has an element of the unknown, but the site will be classed as a Red site on a traffic light system, therefore all they require to work safely should have been taken into considerat­ion and provided before they stepped foot on site. They would be given appropriat­e personal protective equipment  (PPE), and decontamin­ation units / washers. So theoretica­lly they should not have been at nay harm. Some of the stuff that comes out of the ground during site investigat­ions is quite scary, but it can safely be decontamin­ated or remediated via encapsulat­ion.

Working on contaminat­ed sites is always risky, but the public view is generally biased by buzz words like radioactiv­e, contaminat­ed and risk - which generally install panic and fear.
Having worked on several contaminat­ed site, some with more direct risks than this one I'd be certain to make sure I did a damn good job of the remediatio­n, as I'd be at greatest risk on site at the start of the works than the end users would be at the end. It'd be a really interestin­g site to work on that's for sure.
_________________
Some people are like slinkies - of no real use to anyone but give you immense pleasure when pushed down the stairs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Bruce
Site Administrator
Site Administrator

Joined: 08 Apr 2002
Posts: 3689
Location: North Sea

PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Fyfey wrote:
Just another rumour to add to the pile.


That's the spirit Fyfey! Nothing like another 10 rumours to spread round!
_________________
DEE 4 LIFE

If your feeling seasick, go and stand under a tree.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Gillian
David Woodrow
David Woodrow

Joined: 15 Apr 2002
Posts: 602
Location: home sweet home

PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
Just been listening to an interestin­g program on BBC Radio 4 "Costing the Earth: The big clean up". It was talking about redevelopi­ng brownfield sites, the pros and cons and catastroph­es. It also features the ROF and the planned redevelopm­ent in Bishopton.­

Really quite an interestin­g listen, I think it will be on Iplayer if anyone is interested­.
_________________
Find the courage to be yourself,
if you dont,
no-one else will.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
allymcg
Beaver
Beaver

Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 16

PostPosted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote
i would like for the explorers and the scouts to get a wee tour of the site it sounds rather intresting­ :P how would we go about doing that ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
big gus
Cub
Cub

Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 36
Location: Bish

PostPosted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote
Some of us have done it before.

The best person to talk to about will be david woodrow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bishy Boys Forum Index :: Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

 Who is Online 
Who is Online Our users have posted a total of 37494 articles
We have 338 registered users
The newest registered user is kenneth
There has been 5 user(s) online today: ewan.c, Fyfey, Snab, Starky, WeeCol 
In total there are 2 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests   [ Administrator ]   [ Moderator ]
Most users ever online was 110 on Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:40 am
Registered Users: None
Seach Engines: Google, Yahoo!


The views expressed on this site are those of its creators and not necessarily the views of
The Scout Association and definitely not those of 1st Bishopton Scout Group.
All contents © 2001-2008 Bishopton Rovers
Powered by mxBB Portal & phpBB | About mxBB Portal